DAY 1)
to be continued.......
Just for laughs!
In finance we can quantify an investment by predicting the future cash flow of an intended investment. This means that we compare the return of 2 of more investment and choose the one with higher return. I suppose we can do that for marriage!
Let’s take a look at the startup cost of marriage. Based on today’s current market rate, a wedding dinner would cost approximately $40000, assuming 40 tables cost $1000 each. Other costs includes photo taking session $2500, cards and gifts $3000, down payment for a new flat $20000, renovations $30000 honeymoon, $10000, diamond ring ($3000-$30000) if you know what I mean! A simple wedding would cost you up to 100 to 130 grand! So what’s the opportunity cost of $130k?
· A Honda Civic Type R = $100k with enough change to buy 30 LV Bag costing 1k each
· Enough money to travel 2 times round the world with enough change to buy 3 Rolex
· A lifetime supply of haircut with wash
· Lifetime supply of fuel for your car
· Prada, Gucci, LV you name it
According to Cris, Marriage is an agreement in which a man loses his bachelor degree and a woman gains her masters. How true is that! I asked around if it’s okay if couples maintain and manage individual finances after marriage and the answer is an unanimous NO. Do men get married for sex and get broke as a result?
Let’s consider another scenario. What if we decide to retain our bachelor degree (singlehood) and spend it “wisely” with our $130k? Assuming you have the urge to go for “part time course” (intercourse) 3-5 times a week and it costs you $100 per session, it will cost you $300-$500 a week, $1200-$2000 a month and $14k to $20k a year. With notes (condoms) it would cost you another $30 per week, $120 a month and $1.4k a year. This would add up to $15k to $21k annually. How about extra curriculum activities (other vices) such as music class (Lap Sup Bar KTV), additional research (Which LV or Gucci bag your girlfriends fancy), Physical Education (massage parlours)? This would add up close to an estimated additional 10-20k annually. Thus the total cost of maintaining your bachelor degree would cost you close to approximately 30-50k depending on how far you want to score. Assuming you retain your bachelor status for 30 years, it will cost you an approximately 900k to 1.5million!
There appears to be a flaw in the above assumption that losing your bachelor degree (getting married) would cost only $130k. This cost can actually be eliminated from the Hongbaos you received from the wedding dinner. Assuming you have 400 guests from 40 tables and each guests subsidize you $120 (some relatives might give you more) each, this would add up to 48k. For the renovation costs and down payment for your flat, you will probably breakeven after you sell your flat in 10 years. For the diamond ring, that’s probably the last ring you will buy for your wife and if she wears it for 30 years, a 5k ring will only cost you $167! a year. For the honeymoon, you can actually pay off with the surplus from the Ang Bao. It’s clear now which is more feasible. I did my sums; feel free to lose your bachelor degree.
MCP is an acronym which stands for Male Chauvinist Pig. In order to fit into this category, you must
1. Always insist you are right.
2. Make every decision.
3. Be stubborn
4. Confused on what actually went wrong.
5. And never admit your mistake.
Before I go on to explain how this term came out. Perhaps I can describe the different demographics between a man and a woman using 3 theories. They are
· Accounting Theory
· Terms and Condition subject to changes
· The Gambling theory
The difference between a guy and a girl when it comes to accounting is that a guy will always “close the account” on a daily basis whereas a girl uses accrual basis. This means that if a guy ends of a day without his girlfriend complaining or quarrelling, you would assume that all is fine. Of course that’s a wrong assumption because what girl does is she will “accrue” over a period of time and strikes when the time is right. This means that what she’s unhappy might be donkey years ago but somehow or rather it will be presented in the current “financial statement”.
Terms and condition refers to STRICTLY no provision in any changes. In simple terms, this mean that you are not allowed to make any deviation from the plans that you have promised to do. “For instance, you promised to take her to the beach over the weekend, however due to some unforeseen circumstances, you postponed your plan” Well, this is not acceptable under the 10 commandments of pathology. ( PAT THO means dating in dialet) You might have the best of reasons, but still it is strictly prohibited.
The next theory that I am going to describe is called the gambling theory. In games such as poker or texas hold’em, there are strategies whereby you can either split the cards (CAI PAI) or joint your cards for a advantage in the game. Well you might come across situations whereby you are certain that you are going to win this particular quarrel but the other party can split the cards(means telling you that it is a separate matter and you are in the wrong!) or joint the cards( means telling you that what do you have to repeat your mistake from your previous incident).
However, I beg to defer. In my opinion, MCP stands for Manly Charismatic and Personality. Anyone that is deemed a MCP should be proud of it. Even the biggest company in the world has a terms and condition that states subject to changes and is incapable of fulfilling their obligations at times, thus its natural to have provisions for the statements that we have made(it’s okay to break a promise due to a valid reason)
Secondly, if you ever give birth to a boy and when he’s old enough to learn spelling, the only time he can score 9/10 is when you forbit to teach him the world “PROMISE”. This would save him from unnecessary if anyone blames him in the future. He can proudly say “Promise? “I never learnt that in school.
Well, as the saying goes, Nan Ren Bu Huai, Nu Ren Bu Ai. (Man not bad, girls don’t like). So the next time you are labeled a MCP, Smile and receive the compliments graciously, you are one step to becoming the next best thing !
There are a few success stories on people who don’t graduate from University but ended up earning much more than people who graduate with high paying jobs. Bill Gates is an over-used example so I shall refrain from using him as my thesis. How about hawkers? Businessmen ? Entrepreneurs ? Whom manages to carve a niche for themselves and makes good money. We often hear that education is a waste of time and when you go out to work, everything else remains constant. “Ceteris Paribus”
My explanation on the difference between the poor and the rich is based on an economic perspective I learnt in school. On my first macroeconomics lecture I came across these two terms, Induction and Deduction. As the definition implies,
· With the inductive method we begin with an accumulation of facts, which are then arranged systematically and analyzed so as to permit the derivation of a principle or arranged systematically and analyzed so as to permit the derivation of a principle or generalization. Induction moves from facts to theory, from the particular to the general.
· Economists may also go about their task by beginning at the level of theory and proceeding to the verification or rejection of this theory by an appeal to the facts. This is the deductive, or hypothetical, method.
The remaining article will describe why people who are uneducated can earn a higher return compared to the educated.
My assumptions in my thesis are that the educated tend to be deductive, whereas the uneducated tend to have an inductive characteristic. My assumptions are derived based on the fact that the educated tend to read more and hold a regular job, they read more and thus tend to apply whatever they have learnt on books to their job or to their daily lives.
In comparison to the uneducated, as they have no prior or little education compared to the educated, the uneducated have to derive knowledge from either experience or observations, thus when they learn something new, and it works well, they actually induce a theory because they did not refer to any theory to begin with.
So What Has This Got To Do With Who Makes More Money?
Well, in order to gain an abnormal return, you possibly cannot go with the flow but have to go against the flow. Take the stock market for example, if everyone can learn valuation knowledge from books, no one would be able to profit from abnormal returns because everyone is faced with the same identical information and knowledge. This is known as the efficient market hypothesis in portfolio management.
So How Do We Make Lots of Money from the Stock Market?
My thesis on why the uneducated makes an abnormal return is because the information they have learn from induction is not available from any books or published from any source. This “Independent” findings works solely for the user who has induced that particular theory and works well solely for that user. This is shown from many businessmen, who earn more than people who have received higher education compared to them. As they are not educated, they have to rely on their experience to carve out a niche for themselves. Subsequently, they discover a particular method or model that works well for them. However, what they do not realize is that they have actually induced a new theory. Another reason is possibly due to the fact that they are not restricted by theories.
To substantiate my thesis, I shall give an illustration on the business model of a loanshark. Well, in the past, if you were to borrow money, you probably need to bring your identity card, visit a loanshark, and sign an IOU certificate. This “business model” is not very effective because the loanshark are exposed to high risk of defaulting their “loans” and getting caught by the police.
Then the illegal business model was evolved into something that deserves commendation.
If you are in an urgent need of money today, you visit a loanshark, but instead of exchanging cash for an IOU, he takes you to a departmental store that accepts installment payment scheme. In this scenario let’s assume you want to borrow $5000. The loanshark purchases a Plasma television that is worth $7000 and you pay for it under your name. The end result is that you get the $5ooo cash, the loanshark receives a Plasma television which he/she can sell more than $5000, and he avoids default risk as you have to pay the installment in your own discretion. How ingenious can this be? The particular who thought of this model would have gotten a distinction for a business model project if he ever made it to University.
My point is not to conduct in illegal businesses but people who induce theories have a higher chance of gaining a higher return compared to people who deduce theories. No doubt that it is good to read more and receive a higher education, but it is definitely not the way to make it rich. The next time you don’t understand a point made by your lecturer in school, think in another perspective that the lecturer is not doing a good job in explaining well. Well if all else fails, fret not, because you will probably make it bigger on your own!